Neha Bora event triggers fresh political row at Jadavpur University

A political row has erupted at Jadavpur University after a Left-led convention featuring AISA national president Neha Bora. Amid allegations of procedural lapses and protests from ABVP and ABRSM, Vice-Chancellor Chiranjib Bhattacharya dissolved the programme approval and monitoring committee.

Paulami Mondal
5 min read
Neha Bora event triggers fresh political row at Jadavpur University

Political controversy has once again intensified at Jadavpur University. On October 5, a convention was organised on the university campus at the initiative of Left-wing student organisations. The chief speaker at the event was Neha Bora, a prominent youth leader from the national capital and national president of the All India Students’ Association (AISA). The controversy surrounding the event eventually led Vice-Chancellor Chiranjib Bhattacharya to dissolve the committee responsible for approving and monitoring such programmes.

On October 5, 2026, Left-wing student and youth organisations jointly organised a convention titled “Gen Z Movement: Unity of Generation and Resistance” at Jadavpur University. The event was initially scheduled to be held at the K.P. Basu Memorial Hall. However, due to the large turnout, it was subsequently shifted to the open space in front of Gandhi Bhavan. Discussions at the convention centred on demands to scrap the National Education Policy and the National Testing Agency (NTA), opposition to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, the Indian Statistical Institute Bill, 2026, and protests against what the organisers described as continuing attacks on educational institutions. Besides Neha Bora, SFI leader Srijan Bhattacharya, SRFTI Students’ Council president Blossom Hazarika and representatives of various student and youth organisations addressed the gathering.

The convention was followed by an intense administrative and political dispute within the university. AISA’s Jadavpur unit claimed that it had submitted its application on September 21 in accordance with the prescribed rules and that the concerned committee had approved the programme on September 25. However, Jadavpur University’s officiating Registrar Debjit Dutta claimed that neither the relevant file nor any letter granting permission had reached his office. According to the university administration, the committee can only make recommendations under the existing rules, while final approval rests with the Registrar. The administration maintained that this protocol had not been followed in this case.

Amid allegations of procedural lapses and strong protests from the ABVP and the Akhil Bharatiya Rashtriya Shaikshik Mahasangh (ABRSM), Vice-Chancellor Chiranjib Bhattacharya issued a directive on October 6 dissolving the Committee for Approval and Monitoring of Programmes, which had been constituted on March 24. A show-cause notice was also issued to the committee’s chairman and the Dean of Students’ Welfare. It was further stated that all such matters would henceforth be handled directly by the officiating Registrar.

Neha Bora, who has led protests in Delhi against the Election Commission and the SIR and has recently faced alleged police harassment, launched a sharp attack on the Centre and the ruling establishment from the Jadavpur platform. She said that the Left does not fear. Criticising what she described as attempts to suppress secular and democratic thought through attacks on educational institutions, she alleged that mechanisms such as the SIR had been created in Bengal to facilitate political power and dominance. She said that taking away people’s right to vote amounted to taking away the very life of democracy.

Bora further warned that those who assume that Left-wing activists merely read books and deliver eloquent speeches would be proved wrong when it came to resistance. She said they would fight back against injustice and bring down what she described as the arrogance of those in power. Linking the struggles at Jantar Mantar in Delhi with those at Jadavpur University and SRFTI, she called upon students to unite to defend the progressive traditions of student politics.

The incident has sharply escalated political tensions within the university. The ABVP and the teachers’ organisation Akhil Bharatiya Rashtriya Shaikshik Mahasangh have strongly objected to the event. They alleged that political meetings were organised on campus by bringing in outsiders in violation of university rules, and claimed that there had been a larger conspiracy behind bypassing the Registrar’s approval.

The Left-wing student organisations, however, have accused the administration of bias. They questioned why no objection had been raised when a nationalist convention was held at the university earlier in September, where BJP leader Rahul Sinha and Jadavpur’s incumbent BJP MLA Sarbari Mukhopadhyay had attended as guests. They also pointed to an incident in August when a section of ABVP supporters allegedly entered the campus forcibly, vandalised property and injured students, questioning why the Vice-Chancellor or university administration had not taken similarly stringent action at the time.

Although the programme-monitoring committee has now been dissolved on the Vice-Chancellor’s orders, no new committee has yet been constituted, nor has any formal response to the show-cause notices been made public. Officiating Registrar Debjit Dutta has stated that the university believes in freedom of expression, but that the complications arising from holding political programmes without following prescribed procedures are being examined.

With the controversy showing no signs of abating, political tensions on the Jadavpur University campus remain at a high.

Written by
Paulami Mondal
Paulami Mondal
2 Followers

Read more

SIR: The Supreme Court’s role under scrutiny

The SIR debate has largely focused on the Election Commission, but another institution deserves equal scrutiny: the Supreme Court. When millions risk losing their voting rights, the question is not only what the Commission has done, but what the judiciary did.

Smit Machchhar health update: What we know about the injuries

Captain Smit Machchhar is steadily recovering after a serious head injury, with doctors closely monitoring his vision and overall health.

Why Is Paschim Banga back in Bengal’s name Debate?

The West Bengal government plans to introduce a Bill to rename the state Paschim Banga, reviving a name-change debate that has continued since 1999. Why has the proposal returned now, and what does the new name signify?

Nadeem Ahmed arrest: Delhi Police probe AI-generated poster and reel circulated during protest

Delhi Police arrested 24-year-old Nadeem Ahmed over allegedly AI-generated posters and reels falsely presented as CCTV footage during October 3 protests.

Why did Rahul Gandhi’s march to the Election Commission end?

The INDIA bloc’s march to meet CEC Gyanesh Kumar was stopped by police, triggering detentions and a standoff at Akashvani Bhavan. Why was the Opposition denied access to the Election Commission?

Bengal By-Elections: Symbol-less Trinamool in Nandigram, Humayun Kabir arrested in Rejinagar

The Nandigram and Rejinagar by-elections are the first major electoral test of Bengal’s new political landscape after the BJP’s 2026 Assembly victory. Amid high turnout, electoral-roll disputes, arrests and allegations of irregularities, the contests raise wider questions about democracy and representation.

Why did the Supreme Court reject the ECI’s Form 6 claim?

The Supreme Court has clarified that it never approved any modification to Form 6, contradicting the Election Commission’s claim that its SIR-linked declaration had judicial backing. Why did the ECI invoke the court’s May judgment to defend a change already questioned by two Election Commissioners?